Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:33

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Rikishi calls for WWE writers to be fired for botching Jey Uso’s world title run - Cageside Seats
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Research roundup: Ping-pong bots, the genetic key for ginger cats, and more - Ars Technica
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What was your best unexpected reunion with your childhood best friend?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How and why do cats purr? Scientists finally found the answers - Earth.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.